The future of luxury is not leather


'I couldn't tell the difference from a real leather bag' - is the highest compliment that I have received. And you really just can’t! But the real beauty of FERRON is that you will always be able to tell the story of how it’s made differently than leather bags derived from animals. 

This is FERRON

As a vegan designer brand, we want to create stunning bags that you will fall in love with. Our first choice for materials is purely based on principle, starting with animals in mind. Therefore, we opted for Polyurethane (PU) and Eco-microfiber that provide the luxury feel of real leather without harming a single animal.

The exterior of the bag is structured, yet perfectly imitates the soft feel of pebbled leather that you would expect from a luxury leather bag. The lining is made out of microfiber, which is durable, yet smooth to the touch.

And yes, I wish I could say that synthetic alternatives are already perfect and come with no environmental concerns. While this is not the case yet, new technologies will soon provide plant-based leather alternatives that are 100% biodegradable. Until that is possible, I want to demystify the environmental impact of synthetic alternatives and compare it to leather made from animal skins. 

At this point in time, PU leather has less than half of the environmental impact than leather derived from animals.

This is the outcome of two major studies within the fashion industry. The first study, Pulse of the Fashion Industry, was published by The Global Fashion Agenda, in collaboration with The Boston Consulting Group and came to the following conclusion:

3 of the 4 worst materials for the environment, per kilogram, are derived from animals, according to the research.

Pulse of the Fashion Industry

Source: Pulse of the Fashion Industry


The second study came to a similar conclusion and was released by the International Fashion Conglomerate, Kering, who owns quite a few of the worlds most renowned luxury brands (see a list here). The environmental impact of synthetics is about half compared to processing animal skin. 

Kering Environmental Profit & Loss (EP&L)

Source: Kering Environmental Profit & Loss (EP&L)